A report on the transition of foreign trade development guidance, is expected to be within the Executive Office of the State Council issued in the form of a file.
The reporter was informed that the guidance is based in fact precisely the last year as a major issue for the Department of Commerce, the era after the crisis of China's foreign trade in development strategies.
This configuration of nearly 300 researchers of the major issues the final form of the guidance, has passed the checks of the ministries.
Guidance is expected to remain is a framework, Department of Commerce has been expected in the research results into guidance, but also promulgated more detailed compatibility practical measures.
The main topics of the authors, the Department of Commerce Institute researcher Li this reporter's interview, one sentence summarizes the retake the China external trade development after the strategy is to "consolidate trade power status, promote trade power process", the subject of more importance to the quality indicators of foreign trade, rather than quantitative indicators referred to in the trade volume has doubled in ten years.
ABC in Canton fair Spring Conference calls to the export rebate policy revert to a neutral policy, all with full refund. However, in June, the decision-making was declared off number of iron and steel, the export tax rebate rate.
Li gang insists on "two gaoyizi" regulation should be adopted domestic tax adjustments and non-tax adjustment, trade policy strategy is to strengthen the independence, integrity policy, stability, transparency and predictability.
"Regulation of foreign trade policy should reflect a population pressure. "One of the Department of Commerce officials issue Dean Hogg's founding, reduce the export tax rebate rate cut this part of the funds, it should be added to the Foreign Trade Development Fund, the need to support the field of foreign trade, to make the change of foreign trade growth mode into the system.
1. just trade volume has doubled in ten years
Strategic objectives, both countries are identified to ensure that the world's first trading country of destination. China's strategic goal is to further strengthen trade power status, promote trade power process, the core is to speed up the transformation of foreign trade development. United States export plan's strategic objective is to ensure that the number one world trade big and powerful position in its core is the United States economy debt from the past to promote export-oriented growth mode steering push and manufacturing growth pattern, using its strong position in greater quantities for export expansion.
"21st century": the main issue raises a trade in the ten years of the plan, propose to double the number of indicators consider? this United States five years has exports doubled plan?
Li: this and Obama at the beginning of this year's 5-year export multiplication is not directly related, in fact, last November, the first draft of our subjects have already come out, you can specifically, target setting and the development of the national economy as a whole is expected to highly relevant, from China's economic development as a whole, ten years doubled my personal view is relatively conservative estimates and judgement.
According to estimates, the annual growth rate of economic growth probably 7.2%, trade can achieve doubled in ten years, scholars generally believe that China GDP7% growth rate to maintain more than 10 years without much problem. In accordance with the law, trade growth and higher than GDP growth, particularly in the 1990s economic globalization, trade volume growth is often the economic growth rate more than double the average is 10 per cent of the growth rate of 4% compared to trade-economic growth of 5%.
Although after the crisis, we believe that trade growth will return to the GDP growth rate closer and a normal level, but will still be higher than the GDP growth, this is the global rules, China must also follow this rule.
I personally also on Sino-new trade strategy to do some comparisons. Strategic objectives, both countries are identified to ensure that the world's first trading country of destination. China's strategic goal is to further strengthen trade power status, promote trade power process, the core is to speed up the transformation of foreign trade development. This is to speed up the transformation of foreign economic development at the heart of the way, but also China's economic growth by investment and exports two carriages pulled into consumption, investment and exports, increased focus on coordination of stimulating domestic demand in the internal demands the development mode.
While the United States export plan's strategic objective is to ensure that the number one world trade big and powerful position in its core is the United States economy debt from the past to promote export-oriented growth mode steering push and manufacturing growth pattern, using its strong position more quantity of expansion, this is to ensure that the United States in the 21st century is the century of important strategic point.
So from a strategic location, and the United States trade strategy core positioning are the same, just different priorities. China foreign trade development strategy: to promote economic growth, promote employment, improve international status. United States export orientation of the new strategy are to: promote employment, the promotion of economic recovery, sustainable growth, ensure that the United States global leadership.
Visible, Sino-US trade strategy of positioning is essentially the same; however, some differences in priorities.
"21st century": the China external trade surplus of pressure has been relatively large, this two-year trade friction are very frequent, reinstate foreign trade strategies continue to multiply such quantitative indicators will be uncontroversial? state final published guidance will avoid this formulation?
Hopi Nation: there's a misunderstanding, 10 years exports doubled only subject study involved in the estimation of an amount, and the United States by five years exports doubled plan nothing comparable. The key to the whole issue is changing the way the urgency of the foreign trade development.
Li: in considering how to break the silence, that is to say in response to what is after the crisis era in China's foreign trade in development strategies, I summarized in three words: the first sentence after the crisis era is China's strategy is to accelerate the shift in foreign trade development strategies; the second sentence is in the context of globalization, new trade strategy should be focused on improving the competitiveness of China's foreign trade strategies; the third sentence, after the crisis era, in the
We already is a big place, exports have occupied the first condition, it is necessary to consider the development of foreign trade more balanced.Statistics say that 2009 China's export trade in goods is the first in the world, but that's just a single project, first, the total score we lag behind the United States. In fact, according to our estimates, 2009 China export trade in goods only United States cargo trade exports 90%, and not really reached the first position. And the United States does not recognize China export this statement, the United States export statistics is to trade in goods and services of two combined, according to this calculation, the United States still is the first in the world.
So in the retake foreign trade strategy, we are more concerned with trade in goods balance between imports and exports, as well as trade in goods and services trade balance of both, we are the nation's trade surplus of goods, trade in services is the deficit countries.
In the interpretation of the Chinese foreign trade strategy, I mentioned three layers of meaning should do a complete understanding of the entire strategy is not a simple trade doubled concept. One sentence summarizes just consolidate trade power status, promote trade power process, we use such a pointer to the reference to the description of the strategy, rather than trade volume has doubled in ten years.
2 make measurements: with the world's top trading company
Subject of research, we have made a number of quantifiable quality goal: for example, to have some of the world's top multinational companies and a large number of small and medium-sized multinational corporations towards 2015, there are four or five multinational entered top 100 of the world. Also suggested a ten year period, with a number of world-class brands. 12
No comments:
Post a Comment